These are the RealVail archived files. Please visit our new site:
www.realvail.com
MM_XSLTransform error.
Error opening http://www.weather.gov/data/current_obs/KEGE.xml.
Glowing about your recent Grand Canyon trip? Uranium mining could literally do the trick
Uranium mining near the Grand Canyon? Say it ain't so.
Courtesy of deftgurl/Flickr 

Glowing about your recent Grand Canyon trip? Uranium mining could literally do the trick

By David O. Williams

May 27, 2009 —  Nothing says Wild West, summer road-trip, vacation with the kids quite like dipping a gold pan in a chilly Rocky Mountain stream, taking a burro ride along a dusty mining trail, or sifting for fool’s gold in a sluice box. But a new twist this summer could be rollicking in the yellow-cake uranium at one of eight new claims near the Grand Canyon.

Or how about zip lines between gas rigs in your favorite National Forest roadless area in Colorado? With families staying closer to home and exploring nature’s wonders during the Great Recession — and giving the Heisman (i.e., the stiff arm) to the cruises and theme park visits of more affluent times — the opportunities to Disney-fy the wilderness around energy exploration are virtually limitless.

Even as the National Park Service this week was reminding summer vacationers of our nation’s outdoor bounty, the Pew Environment Group was reminding Interior Secretary Ken Salazar of the energy-industry threats to that bounty. The nonprofit group fired off a letter requesting Salazar remove 1 million acres of public lands from consideration for new mining claims under the — do we have to even note that it’s “antiquated”? — 1872 Mining Law..

The chairs of both the House and Senate natural resources committees have introduced bills this session aimed at reforming the law, which was originally signed by Ulysses S. Grant to encourage pioneers to head west with pickaxes in hand.

Pew has also joined a long list of environmental groups pushing for a development moratorium on more than 54 million acres of National Forest roadless areas nationwide and a return to the Clinton administration’s roadless rule, first implemented in 2001 but quickly tossed out by the Bush administration. The return to the Clinton rule would block roads for new energy exploration and production on more than 4.4 million acres in Colorado.

Meanwhile, Henry Waxman, D-Calif., may not “have the nuts” to pass the American Clean Energy and Security Act (at least according to his GOP counterpart on the House Energy and Commerce Committee), but some Colorado environmentalists say the bill itself doesn’t have the teeth it needs to truly transform America’s energy infrastructure.

While being sure to carefully praise Waxman’s bill (H.R. 2454) as the full committee takes up debate on it this week, Denver-based Environment Colorado also issued a release saying the draft legislation is too watered down to make the meaningful changes necessary.

“Unfortunately, Big Oil, Dirty Coal, other polluters have been able to weaken the bill in ways that will delay the economic and environmental benefits of clean energy and miss the opportunity to make a real transition in the nation’s energy policy,” said Keith Hay, energy advocate for Environment Colorado

Specifically, Hay said the renewable electricity standard in the draft version won’t require the nation to use more renewable energy than what will be achieved through state standards already in place and investments from the stimulus bill.

Hay also said the bill allows polluters to purchase offsets rather than reduce their own pollution and that it falls short of requiring polluters to pay for their pollution through a carbon tax or cap-and-trade system. He urged Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., who serves on the Energy and Commerce Committee that Waxman chairs, to push hard to strengthen and pass the bill.

 

 

Comment on article  2 Comments on "Glowing about your recent Grand Canyon trip? Uranium mining could literally do the trick"

 

Short person — May 27, 2009

Concerning uranium exploration and mining in the Grand Canyon region. The area contains more than 40% of the US uranium resources, and exploration and mining there have virtually no impact on the environment or the people (or other biota) sharing the same area. For more detail, see the Environmental Working Group news article archived at http://www.dirxploration.com/EWG2232009.pdf, and the NEPA-format Draft Environmental Assessment posted at http://public.dirxploration.fastmail.us/.

 

Roger Clark — May 28, 2009

Grand Canyon Superintendent Steve Martin opposes uranium mining near the Grand Canyon:
"There should be some places that you just do not mine. I worry about uranium escaping into the local water, and about its effect on fish in the Colorado River at the bottom of the gorge, and on the bald eagles, California condors and bighorn sheep that depend on the canyon's seeps and springs. More than a third of the canyon's species would be affected if water quality suffered.

 

 

Comments
Comment Form Info  Comment Information
RealVail encourages you to post comments on our articles and blogs. Name and email are required for monitoring purposes. Your email will not be published and will not be distributed to any 3rd-party. Abusive, obscene, profane, threatening, libelous or defamatory comments are prohibited. By posting a comment, you agree to this policy and our terms of use. To report an abusive posting, please contact us.

Please enter the case-sensitive letters you see in the left box to prove that you are human and indeed reading this page. This prevents spam and malicious attacks. Click the refresh icon to refresh words.

To comment or contact us, please visit our new site at http://www.realvail.com

 

ColoradoSki.com Snow Report Ticker
Search Realvail.com

more new stories...


more new stories...

more resort guides...

lYNX