These are the RealVail archived files. Please visit our new site:
MM_XSLTransform error.
Error opening
Some say the proliferation of rides like this alpine slide could have detrimental impacts to ski areas operating on public lands.
Some say the proliferation of rides like this alpine slide could have detrimental impacts to ski areas operating on public lands.
Udall tries to better define ski-area recreation options
But some say bill is too vague and could allow more amusement park-style activities
By David O. Williams

July 28, 2008 — Coming soon to a ski area near you: water parks, carnival rides, go-kart tracks and an overall urban sense of what constitutes recreation.

Not exactly, said a spokesman for U.S. Rep. Mark Udall, D-Colo., who has introduced a bill that would change a 1986 law governing ski-area permits on National Forest land so that the Forest Service has more latitude to allow year-round recreation other than skiing.

A strange mix of environmentalists and wealthy resort-area homeowners has raised concerns about the vague wording of the bill, which could allow ski-area operators to radically urbanize the relatively natural setting of resorts operating on public lands.

“We’re supportive of some modifications to the act, but we feel like Udall’s bill, as currently written, is too broad and could authorize virtually any recreational activity or facility,” said Ryan Bidwell, executive director of the ski-area watchdog group Colorado Wild, which has joined 15 other western environmental groups to oppose inappropriate uses.

“Basically urbanized activities like roller coasters, water parks, concert amphitheaters, mini-golf — facilities that don’t depend on a natural setting at all, that aren’t dependant on the resources that national forest lands offer,” Bidwell said.

Udall’s office said the bill, which would now have to be amended in committee or on the House floor, does not compel the Forest Service to approve any particular activity or facility, but does require that the activities be natural-resource-based, encourage outdoor recreation and are in harmony with the natural setting.

“The bill is narrowly targeted,” Udall said in a statement. “I think it will help encourage more people to enjoy Colorado’s outdoor recreation opportunities — and that is also good for our mountain community economy.

“But Congress shouldn’t get into the business of deciding whether any particular activity or facility is right for a particular ski area. The Forest Service is in the best position to decide that, and the point of the bill is to give them clear authority to make that call.”

A spokeswoman for Bob Schaffer, Udall’s Republican opponent in the race for the U.S. Senate, initially indicated a desire to address the issue, but then did not provide a statement from the former congressman.

Right now the law limits ski-area permits to alpine and Nordic skiing, not even mentioning the sport of snowboarding or alpine slides, mini-golf courses and mountain-bike trails and skills parks that already currently operate at ski areas around the state.

“This legislation more accurately reflects what is already taking place at mountain resorts and would help to clarify and affirm the Forest Service's authority to allow appropriate year-round activities,” Vail Resorts spokeswoman Kelly Ladyga said, adding that ski areas for years have been trying to develop more year-round business models.

“Our mountain resort communities have been working hard to expand the cultural and recreational offerings in non-winter seasons that appeal to families in order to build a healthy economy with year-round employment opportunities,” Ladyga said.

Vail Resorts in still in litigation with the Beaver Creek Property Owners Association over the ski company’s proposal to install an alpine slide (wheeled carts ridden downhill on a long fiberglass track) at Beaver Creek ski area. A gag order was imposed by the judge in that case, but at a 2006 hearing on the matter, an attorney for the homeowners made their feelings clear.

“One, it’s a breach of trust, and number two it’s a nuisance,” homeowners’ attorney Rick Johnson said of the slide, which he claimed violated the resort’s development agreements. “It’s not Disneyland.”



Comment on article  1 Comment on "Udall tries to better define ski-area recreation options"


M. Porter — July 28, 2008

Folks should understand that Matt Sugar, a former Intrawest communications hack, has become Udall's political assistant and is now based in Minturn. Has Udall allowed himself to get in bed with the development interests of the ski industry? These are the same folks whose greed is effectively killing economical access to snowsports for folks who actually live in Colorado! Oh and let's not forget that the Forest Service has already allowed Vail Resorts to coop the USFS National Forest Foundation with hundreds of thousands of dollars of donations!



Comment Form Info  Comment Information
RealVail encourages you to post comments on our articles and blogs. Name and email are required for monitoring purposes. Your email will not be published and will not be distributed to any 3rd-party. Abusive, obscene, profane, threatening, libelous or defamatory comments are prohibited. By posting a comment, you agree to this policy and our terms of use. To report an abusive posting, please contact us.

Please enter the case insensitive letters you see in the left box to prove that you are human and indeed reading this page. This prevents spam and malicious attacks. Click the refresh icon to refresh words.

To comment or contact us, please visit our new site at Snow Report Ticker

more new stories...

more new stories...

more resort guides...